... and in all honesty, was it a game-changer? (popular opinion is "No"). Nonetheless, each VP candidate seemed to achieve their own goals, boosting support for their respective leaders and attacking each other's tops (instead of a VP vs. VP smackdown). Political pundits are having a field day right now. Analysts from each side are lauding the performance of the two (and it was genuinely a good debate).
Generally, Palin seemed warm and regained the Republican party moral by being eloquent. Biden showed his competency in foreign policy and made some specific points on the domestic economy.
Coverage on the VP debate (CNN)BBC News - comments from around the worldTHE OBJECTIVE:
* Democratic VP running-mate, Joe Biden, was trying to hammer John McCain and reinforce that Obama-Biden was in agreement - mission accomplished.
* Republican VP running-mate, Sarah Palin, was trying to redeem her reputation from recent embarrassing media bites and boost the morals of conservatives - mission accomplished.
THE OFFENSIVE:
* Joe Biden attacked the Bush administration legacy and pointed out that the McCain ticket did not have any specific plans. Biden remarks that McCain is "not really a maverick on the things that matter." - Ding, ding!
* Sarah Palin points out the Democratic President & VP's differences and Biden's criticism of Obama in the past. - Ding, ding!
THE DEFENSIVE:
* Biden showed restraint to avoid looking sexist and condescending - done.
* Palin showed that she could speak (somewhat) intelligibly on foreign policy (beyond "Alaska and Russia share a maritime border") and was a worthy running-mate for the R. party - done.
THE CHARM FACTOR:
* Biden flashed the whitest, Cheshire-cat grin (sort of cheesy) as much as possible. Talked from "my neighborhood" point of view and played the cards of a single-parent, about to send his son off to Iraq.
* Palin emitted folksy charm, was telegenic, and winked a lot. Brought 'Joe Six-pack' and 'Hockey Moms' with her to the podium.
THE FUMBLES:
* Biden sometimes got long-winded in Senate talk and lost the audience (zzz...). Said (firmly) that climate change was man-made.
* Palin: kept on calling the US General in Afghanistan "McClellan" instead of "McKiernan" (oops!). Seemingly agreed to same-sex couple rights, a little too forcefully than what the conservatives might have liked (the evangelicals may have fallen off their chairs).
FOREIGN POLICY:
* Biden seemed to have a command of foreign policy and diplomacy that is generally more cooperative than current administration. He took a stand and exuded confidence.
* Palin-McCain seemed to still have a Washington Concensus and US hegemony flavor in the way they approach foreign policy - a bit over-simplified and forceful indoctrination. (Palin still showed that foreign policy was her weak spot)
In a way, Palin won by not digging a deeper hole. That, would have been a game-changer.
What's your take on the VP debate?